This week, the Economist Intelligence Unit released its first-ever Global Food Security Index rankings. The index, commissioned by U.S. chemical giant DuPont, boils down 25 food and economic indicators to a single number for 105 countries. There’s a nifty website that allows you to paddle around in the data.
Among the findings:
On its website, DuPont announced the new study with the headline, “DuPont Calls for Common Food Security Metrics.” This reflects a general dissatisfaction in the increasingly business-oriented world of international development with the statistics that drive public policy. Go to any meeting of development types, and you can hear the grumbling about the lack of reliable data. You can’t fix what you can’t measure, people say.
The idea of a food security index isn’t new. The International Food Policy Research Institute puts out an annual Global Hunger Index, the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization publishes the State of Food Insecurity in the World, British consulting firm Maplecroft produces a Food Security Risk Index, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture just released its yearly International Food Security Assessment. The authors of the DuPont-Economist study say their index incorporates data on the “nutritional quality and safety of food – elements missing from similar indices.” It also includes subjective measures of things like trade policy, support for research and political stability.
For DuPont, these are not abstract numbers. The world’s third-largest chemical company is also the second-largest seed company and recently became a leader in the global food and nutrition industries, with its acquisition of Danish food additive company Danisco and American soy processor Solae. Its executives know that feeding a hungrier, hotter, more crowded and demanding world is big business indeed.